When is it to be accepted that nuclear energy is not the answer to safe energy needs. It's potentially a disaster waiting to happen. It's use has had devasting affects in the war arena. How is this viewed as a safe source of energy. It's just like the issue with clean coal,coal has such an impact in it's cost, transport, refinement,lives and the enviroment, nuclear energy is way over the line in all it's cost of maintenance of equipment, cost of life and it's affect on the human body, it's inability for safe containment after it's use. It is sad that our government officials even deem it's use a logical safe energy source.
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.