Sierra Club
Orange County Group

One Earth, One Chance.

[Dividing Line Image]

Conservation Committee Meeting!

The Orange County Group Conservation Committee meets at 7:15 pm on the third Tuesday of each month. For more information call Gail Prothero at 949-347-1255.

The Orange County Group is one of numerous smaller regional groups within the Angeles Chapter (L.A. and Orange Counties) of the Sierra Club. For more information on conservation activities in L.A. and Orange Counties, check out the
Angeles Chapter Conservation pages

[Dividing Line Image]

COAL CANYON WILDLIFE CORRIDOR SECURED!

On June 29, 2001, The State Department of Parks and Recreation purchased a 32-acre parcel in Coal Canyon that is a critical link in the wildlife corridor between the Santa Ana Mountains and Chino Hills State Park. The State purchased the property from Mancha Industries, which had planned development that would be bad news for the mountain lion and other creatures. Wildlife biologists have said that the loss of this site to development would likely cause a cascade of extinctions inside Chino Hills State park—including the mountain lion.

Claire Schlotterbeck, chair of Hills for Everyone, led a coalition of environmentalists and state officials that raised over $2 million. Last year, the State bought 649 acres of open space in Coal Canyon from the St. Clair Company, which owned this parcel that was approved for residential development. The State must maintain these properties in a natural state if the corridor is to be viable for wildlife.

Bill Corcoran, conservation coordinator for the Sierra Club, says, "We should recognize the incredible work of Claire in doggedly pursuing funds for this critical habitat acquisition."

However, wild open space is still threatened in north OC. To complete saving the Tecate cypress, we need to save Gypsum and Fremont Canyons. Please call 714-879-3471 or email Connie Spenger if you are interested in either of these projects. Also, Coyote Hills in north Orange County is a current issue. The last 500 acres of coastal sage in these hills are now in danger of being destroyed by roads and housing tracts. This is a great hiking area close to home. Help save the Coyote Hills and their beautiful wildlife!

[Dividing Line Image]

OPEN SPACE, DEVELOPMENT, THE IRVINE COMPANY AND THE CITY OF ORANGE

The Irvine Company, in fall 2003, made its latest and most detailed development proposals for the hills east of the City of Orange. In its entirety, 4000 homes are envisioned, which physically would be located on both sides of the 241-toll road at the “Chapman Avenue-Santiago Canyon Road” offramp. This 1500-acre development would be adjacent to, and impact severely, both Irvine Park and Irvine Lake. The entire area is surrounded by large tracts of land donated by the Irvine Company to be permanently set aside from development. These lands are part of one of the most biologically important open space areas in the entire state.

In October 2000, the Irvine Company received approval of its general plan to develop “Santiago Hills-Phase Two.” Chris Koontz, then a 19-year-old college student, filed a California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) lawsuit. The settlement agreement arising from this lawsuit provided for a number of environmental protections.

The actual construction of this phase, 1746 homes on 496 acres, was delayed until further approvals of tract maps and a runoff management plan (ROMP). The Irvine Company is now seeking this approval, and hopes that construction permits will now be issued so that grading and general construction activities can begin.

In addition, the Irvine Company is asking the Orange City Council to approve an additional 2400 homes on 1000 more acres, including areas directly contiguous to Irvine Lake. This is referred to as the “East Orange Planned Community.” For a general description of the Irvine Company’s proposal, visit their website at http://www.eastoforange.com/

The Sierra Club Orange Hills Task Force was established to participate in the planning process, raise issues and provide alternatives to the sprawling, residential development that is being proposed. As Chris Koontz has stated, “The Irvine Company gave us a wonderful gift of open space, but now they want to ruin it by placing wasteful sprawl communities right in the middle of it, near Irvine Lake. The result will include:

  1. increased traffic and gridlock on our roads,
  2. increased pollution of our local air and waterways,
  3. increased noise and light pollution,
  4. loss of scenic hill views,
  5. critical loss of wildlife,
  6. higher tax burdens to subsidize their sprawl and infrastructure, and
  7. overcrowded schools.”

The Sierra Club Orange Hill Task Force will fight to protect quality of life for local homeowners and residents. With your help, we can preserve the Orange Hills for our families, for our future! Join us at meetings the fourth Saturday of each month at 9:00 a.m. in Orange; for more information, contact the task force chairman, John Ufkes.

[Dividing Line Image]

Public Transit in Orange County

A well-run transit system could change the nature of traffic, land use, and air quality in our county and the Southern California region. While there is substantial bus service in many parts of the county, some sections remain unserved, and night and weekend service are skeletal. There is very little coordination amongst the different transit providers and accurate transit information is sometimes hard to get. Bus stops do not always have amenities such as benches, shelters, phones and night lighting. On the positive side, transit vehicles are clean, temperature-controlled, and most operators are pleasant and helpful. The Orange County Transit Authority buses are generally on time. The prices are very reasonable.

Metrolink trains are generally on time. Metrolink serves more Orange County cities than Amtrak, and prices are lower, but they only run at peak hours on weekdays. There is no weekend service. Amtrak trains run seven days a week until approximately 10 p.m. Unfortunately, there is usually a 20% chance that they will not be on time, so they are best to use when on-time performance is not crucial.

There is a master transit routing service, similar to Mapquest, available at http://www.scag.ca.gov/transit/ Be forewarned that this service is the most useful for those who already know their way around a little bit, because it can be inaccurate about 20% of the time. If you are unsure, check the results with an experienced transit user.

Contact information for the major transit providers in Orange County:

Orange County Transit Authority
(714) 636-RIDE ext. 10,1 or (800) COMMUTE ext. 1,1,2, then 10,1
Metrolink (800) COMMUTE ext. 1,4
Amtrak (800) USA-RAIL
Airport Bus (800) 772-5299
Greyhound (800) 231-2222
Laguna Beach Transit (949) 497-0746

Here are the 4 public groups we know of working specifically on transit-related issues in Orange County:

Transit Advocates of Orange County (TAOC)
TAOC is an advocate for convenient, reliable, and attractive bus and rail service that better serves the needs of the county’s transit-dependent population, and also attracts a substantial portion of the current motoring public. TAOC would like to see buses, rail, bikes and walking become a normal part of everyday life and feels that improved transit services can help remove the stigma sometimes associated with transit use in Orange County. They have monthly meetings, public forums, a newsletter, an e-mail discussion group, study excursions, transit updates, and regular meetings with OCTA.
Contact info: (866) 476-2282, ext. 4

Rail Advocates of Orange County
RAOC is a committee of the Transit Advocates of Orange County that supports the creation of a modern rail transit system in Orange County. They are providing an arena to focus public support for rail projects and are gathering endorsements for CenterLine from individuals and organizations. RAOC is producing written materials, an e-mail newsletter, a website, and will be giving public presentations.
Contact info: (866) 476-2282, ext. 4

Auto-Free Orange County
Auto-Free Orange County’s mission is to attract people to lifestyles with reduced dependency on cars. They have projects to enhance the image of the auto-free lifestyle, and provide an auto-free counseling service for members to assist with all matters related to living without a car.
Contact info: (949) 452-1393

Santa Ana Pedestrian Safety Task Force
This group addresses citywide solutions for pedestrian safety through engineering, education and enforcement. They offer pedestrian safety presentations, a neighborhood pedestrian safety survey, and monthly meetings.
Contact info: (949) 824-5371

[Dividing Line Image]

TEACH YOUR OLD BERMUDA LAWN NEW TRICKS TO CONSERVE!
by Alex Mintzer

Southern Californians love their Bermuda grass lawns. We lavish much attention on them or pay someone else to do it for us. But our lawns often are an environmental liability in this semiarid climate. We water them frequently. We fertilize them frequently. We pollute as we mow and blow them frequently. And all those clippings frequently go straight to the landfills! Does it have to be this way? Is the only Green alternative to pull out the lawn and plant drought-resistant native plants?

As I tried to 'decommission' a large patch of hybrid Bermuda grass by hand, I discovered vital clues that led to an alternative approach to Bermuda grass management. This grass has really deep roots and is actually quite drought resistant! I recalled seeing Bermuda grass along the side of roads in rural southern Arizona, where it survived only on pavement runoff from very infrequent rains. This discovery led me to practice alternative management techniques that save water, time, money, and reduce air and water pollution. The lawn still looks like a smooth green plush carpet that will preserve neighborhood peace and property values!

Keeping It Green (in more ways than one!)

  1. Water heavily but infrequently. During the dry season, I water my lawn once a month, except from August to October, when I may apply water a little more often. I water each patch for 2-3 hours, which delivers over an inch of water. Since I only water it once a month, I'm not worried that regular watering in the evening might encourage diseases or pests.
  2. Change your mowing habits. First, use a mulching mower to recycle all those clippings into the lawn. If your lawn is small, switch to an electric or manual reel mower. In the spring, set the blade level as high as you can tolerate the turf depth. Thick turf will conserve water and discourage invasion by weeds. If you aggressively remove the thatch every winter, you are providing opportunities for weeds to get established. Although I do lower the blades a bit in late fall, I only try to remove the thatch every other year, and never cut it down to a point where bare dirt is visible.
  3. Good neighbors don't use leaf blowers, or permit them to be used on their premises!
  4. If you recycle clippings, your need for lawn fertilizers is greatly reduced or eliminated.

Getting It Green (in more ways than one!)

Plant roots proliferate in zones with water. Many plants, including Bermuda grass, can be trained to send their roots deep to capture long-lasting soil moisture after heavy, infrequent watering. This training process takes time, often up to a year. Pampered poodles are not turned into self-reliant coyotes overnight. Reduce your watering frequency slowly as you increase the duration when you do water. Spring is the best time to start training your lawn. You'll be glad when the process is complete. You lawn will need care less often, saving time and money. It will consume fewer natural resources. It will generate less fertilizer-laden runoff. And you'll be left wondering what our traditional horticultural experts and the legions of professional lawn maintenance crews are doing. Intensive lawn management is in their business interest, not yours.

[Dividing Line Image]

Buying and driving the Toyota Prius: My personal experience
by Alex Mintzer

What's it like, taking the technological leap forward and buying a new hybrid-engine car? Is the Toyota Prius the right car for you? My observations may help if you're thinking about a new car in the near future.

Back when I was in high school around 1970, I never imagined that our cars would still have piston-driven, internal-combustion engines in the 21st Century. There was already talk of a variety of alternatives back then, such as batteries, fuel cells, hybrid engines, turbines, flywheels, and rotary engines. As the 1990s closed out, I was appalled at the lack of fundamental progress in automotive technology. When I became aware in early 1999 that Toyota was readying the hybrid-engine Prius for the U.S. market, I was interested.

In Fall 1999, I made contact with the automotive technology department at my workplace, Cypress College. They have a cooperative training program with Toyota, and I thought they would have more information. In December, they had a car on campus, and I was able to look it over and take a test ride. It was a model for the Japanese market, where they drive on the left side, so the steering wheel was on the right side of the car. But it was a very attractive small car, with maximimized space for passengers inside the car. With Toyota's excellent reliability record in mind, I decided to replace my 1985 Camry sedan with a new Prius.

In early July 2000, Toyota started taking U.S. orders for Prius on their website (prius.toyota.com). These cars come in one model, with four color options. Beyond that, the only options were a CD player and floor mats. None of the local dealers had any cars on their lot or in the showroom. After ordering on-line, I completed the deal at my local dealer, Toyota of Orange. They took a deposit of $1000 towards a $20,450 car (price excluding taxes, title, registration fee, etc.), and told me to expect a wait of at least a month. I ended up waiting two and a half months before my car showed up. (I understand that the wait is about four months now, and Toyota is adding two new color options.) When the car arrived, the local dealer got it ready quickly, and there were no hidden charges, add-on packages, or price changes.

The Prius has received numerous write-ups in general-interest and auto industry magazines, so I'm not going to go over all its technological innovations here. Consumer Reports magazine recently (December 2000) had a detailed review, which was very well done except that their city mileage figure of 38 MPG is too low! I agree with their assessment that Prius is a very well-designed car. It has ample room for four large adults, with excellent visibility. The instruments and controls are clearly arranged and follow standard expectations. The small video touchscreen mounted in the center dashboard console does take some getting used to; it displays audio system information, as well as engine power source and fuel consumption information. It became less distracting after a couple months of driving. The radio displays sideband information (station ID, market category) for strong stations that supply it. For example, the FM stations are automatically organized into several categories (classical-jazz, easy listening, country, talk etc.) and you can scroll among and select them using the touchscreen. A security system is standard, as is a transponder embedded in the key. This is required to activate the starter circuit. There is a single thermostat dial that controls the inside temperature. The Prius provides a very quiet, smooth ride for a small car. The engine noise is muted. The acceleration is comparable to that in my old Camry- certainly adequate to accelerate and merge on the freeway from an on-ramp meter stoplight. Obviously, this isn't Porsche, BMW, or Corvette initiative, but it's comparable to other small cars like the Corolla, Dodge Neon, or Honda Civic. The EPA fuel economy figures are 52 (city) and 45 (highway). I have averaged about 48 MPG, primarily using the car for a 19-mile, 30-minute commute (one-way) that is about two-thirds freeway mileage. The gas tank is 11.9 gallons, and I have already had one 500-mile tankful (though I usually fill it after 480 miles, when the fuel gauge starts blinking at me!). The fuel economy drops a bit if you use it for brief short trips of only 5-20 minutes. Although I am closing in on 3000 miles, I have not taken it over the Grapevine or Cajon Summit yet, so I can't report on mountain driving.

All in all, I've been happy and favorably impressed with my Prius so far. It's a great commuter car, and deserves serious consideration by anyone who is concerned about local and global air pollution and global warming issues. Also, Prius is an automotive value: Toyota's selling price is apparently far under the manufacturing costs (just the opposite of the deal on large SUVs, where the manufacturer and dealer may pocket $10000 profit on each one sold!).

Choosing an Electricity Company

by Rich Ferguson, Ph.D.
Energy Chair, Sierra Club California

It's about where your money goes

Do you know where your power comes from? Legislation recently passed with support of the Sierra Club requires that all electricity providers disclose to consumers the fuels with which "their" electricity is generated. In 1995, electricity generated in California came from:
Natural Gas 37.5%
Hydroelectric 24.7%
Nuclear 17.3%
Renewables 11.8%
Coal 8.6%
Oil 0.2%

(Renewables include geothermal, biomass, wind, and solar power resources.) In addition, approximately one-sixth of the state's electricity was imported from outside California, the sources of which are difficult to identify.

Whatever happened to public policy?

The Sierra Club has labored to persuade Congress, state legislators and regulators to insist that utilities build cleaner, more environmentally friendly power plants. Have we now given up? Are we now at the mercy of the "free" market? No. Sierra Club activists and staff continue to push for laws and regulations which would reduce the threat of global warming, air pollution, fish kills and other environmental ills related to energy. We promote public policies advancing energy conservation at every opportunity. For better or worse, the electricity industry is changing. Each of us can do our small part for the Earth by making sure that when we pay our electric bill, our money goes where it does the least damage.

[Dividing Line Image]

Airplane.jpg (4758 bytes)

OC Airport Issues

As a grass-roots organization, the Sierra Club supports resident efforts to protect quality of life in local communities.

The Orange County Conservation Committee and the Angeles Chapter support retention of the current nighttime (11 PM- 7 AM) curfew on flight operations at John Wayne Airport after 2005. The number of daily takeoff/landing operations should not be increased after 2005. Annual limits on passenger capacity should not be increased in any way that would increase the daily number of flights to/from John Wayne Airport after 2005.

Additionally, the Orange County Conservation Committee and the Angeles Chapter support the efforts of local communities around El Toro Marine Air Base to create a large Central Park as one of the best nonairport uses. Airports should only be built in communities that want and support them. Public tax money should not be used against residents' wishes for public relations activities, where the consequences would bring more air, water, and ocean pollution. Also, public officials involved in the planning process should hold open forums that maximize public participation.

For more information on El Toro Airport, see the El Toro Airport Info Site.